Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martin Landaluce vs Sho Shimabukuro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Landaluce vs Shimabukuro analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Landaluce vs Sho Shimabukuro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Landaluce 1 - 0 Shimabukuro
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Landaluce has won 48.78% of points on his second serve, while Shimabukuro has won 49.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Landaluce, in recent form, has won 51.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimabukuro has won 49.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.67% and 27.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Landaluce has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimabukuro has saved 55.65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Landaluce has won 55.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 26), with Shimabukuro winning 47.37% (W/L 27/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Landaluce has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 22/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Landaluce has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 22/ 11), where as Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Landaluce winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Landaluce winning 2 and Shimabukuro winning 1. The last match between Landaluce and Shimabukuro was at the Mauthausen Challenger, 06-05-2024, First, Clay with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 5-7 6-1 2-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Landaluce and Shimabukuro have played a deciding set 0 times, with Landaluce winning 0 times and Shimabukuro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Landaluce winning 0, and Shimabukuro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Landaluce has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.49 while Shimabukuro has played against players with an average rank of 295.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Landaluce has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimabukuro has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Landaluce has converted 46.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimabukuro has converted 54.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
311
Rank
311
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
50% (39-39)
Career Total W/L
62% (215-133)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
26% (5-14)
$34,500
Career Prize Money
$196,505
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Landaluce VS Shimabukuro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Martin Landaluce | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:51 | 1:47:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (43/69) | 55% (36/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (29/43) | 61% (22/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (13/26) | 41% (12/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (31/65) | 39% (27/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Landaluce VS Shimabukuro H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. |
Stats 
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martin Landaluce | Sho Shimabukuro |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 26% (5/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (32/24) | 35% (15/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (272/242) | 45% (186/226) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 57 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 89 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:31:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 395.91 | 317.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1044/1707) | 57% (722/1258) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (709/1044) | 68% (489/722) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (326/663) | 49% (264/536) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (80/177) | 55% (40/73) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (686/1659) | 35% (400/1151) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (5/6) | 38% (5/8) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 28% (5/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 63% (8/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 38% (8/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (11/0) |
Martin Landaluce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Martin Landaluce
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Martin Landaluce
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
5-7 6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Seong Chan Hong
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Jea Moon Lee
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Landaluce Vs Shimabukuro Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
